Topic summary
ā 5%1 analyzed article/video1,960 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bridge Repair results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 2.7% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 1,434 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of ā 1% (20,665 of 20,836 topics). This Bridge Repair is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group.
Bridge Repair
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,840
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

1% percentile
02550751000.8% percentile
0.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos