Topic summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video1,787 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brics Expansion results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 566 hits. Analysis detected 5,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,688 of 16,562 topics). This Brics Expansion is better (less manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Brics Expansion
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,148
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos