Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video398 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bribery Scheme results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 51.8% saturation with 619 hits. Analysis detected 2,383 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,194 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.5% and a BS Rank of 93% (1,176 of 16,562 topics). This Bribery Scheme is worse (more manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group.
Bribery Scheme
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,194
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510092.9% percentile
10.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 51.8%51.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 21.9%21.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 30.9%30.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 22.2%22.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.4%11.4%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 51.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 30.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Horn Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.6%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos