Topic summary
51% 1 analyzed article/video 629 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bribery Laws results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29% saturation with 730 hits . Analysis detected 2,923 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,516 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 77% (3,954 of 16,562 topics). This Bribery Laws is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group. Bribery Laws
Topic details
Total words: 2,516
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.1% percentile 5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 29.0% 29.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Topic 6.7% 6.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.6% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Special Pleading: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst