Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video332 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brand Partnerships results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 56.8% saturation with 566 hits. Analysis detected 2,066 faulty-reasoning hits from 996 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,540 of 16,562 topics). This Brand Partnerships is worse (more manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group.
Brand Partnerships
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 996
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510090.7% percentile
9.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles996 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 56.8%56.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.4%24.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 16.8%16.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 17.7%17.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 12.9%12.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 56.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.4%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 16.8%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos