Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Brain Injuries results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 158 hits. Analysis detected 983 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Brain Injuries is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Brain Injuries
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,592
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.8%1.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos