Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video133 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brain Aging results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 121 hits. Analysis detected 597 faulty-reasoning hits from 532 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (795 of 16,562 topics). This Brain Aging is worse (more manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group.
Brain Aging
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 532
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

95% percentile
025507510095.2% percentile
12.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles532 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 19.7%19.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 22.7%22.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 14.7%14.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.7%17.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.6%6.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 6.6%6.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 19.7%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos