Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 409 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Boston Marathon results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 70% saturation with 1,146 hits . Analysis detected 5,575 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,638 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.5% and a BS Rank of 90% (1,662 of 15,326 topics). This Boston Marathon is worse (more manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group. Boston Marathon
Topic details
Total words: 1,638
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.2% percentile 8.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 70.0% 70.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 26.1% 26.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 25.1% 25.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 31.0% 31.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 18.0% 18.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 70.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 31.0%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 26.1%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Topic 25.1%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 19.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 0.0% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.4% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst