Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,061 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Border Patrol Tactics results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42.9% saturation with 1,366 hits. Analysis detected 5,223 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,183 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (4,032 of 16,562 topics). This Border Patrol Tactics is worse (more manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
Border Patrol Tactics
Topic details
Total words: 3,183
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510075.7% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 42.9%42.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.8%12.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.4%14.4%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 42.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Red Herring: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos