Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos959 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Border Patrol Operations results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 1,573 hits. Analysis detected 7,158 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,445 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (8,074 of 16,562 topics). This Border Patrol Operations is worse (more manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
Border Patrol Operations
Topic details
Total words: 8,445
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.3% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.6%18.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos