Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video614 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Border Crisis results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 271 hits. Analysis detected 1,987 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,842 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,184 of 16,562 topics). This Border Crisis is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Border Crisis
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,842
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510068.7% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 14.7%14.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 13.3%13.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Special Pleading: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos