Topic summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 202 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Book results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Representativeness Heuristic as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 187 hits . Analysis detected 1,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 606 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of ā 92% (1,402 of 16,562 topics). This Book is worse (more manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group. Book
Topic details
Total words: 606
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.5% percentile 9.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles606 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Representativeness Heuris⦠Sitewide 1.9% Topic 30.9% 30.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 26.7% 26.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 26.7% 26.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 13.4% 13.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 15.8% 15.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 30.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect: Topic 24.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 26.7%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Topic 26.7%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Composition/Division: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.9% Primacy Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst