Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,555 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bodybuilding results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 3.8% saturation with 236 hits. Analysis detected 1,875 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (16,398 of 16,562 topics). This Bodybuilding is better (less manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group.
Bodybuilding
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,220
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

1% percentile
02550751001.0% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos