Topic summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video570 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bluetooth Technology results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 268 hits. Analysis detected 1,676 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,710 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,443 of 15,769 topics). This Bluetooth Technology is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group.
Bluetooth Technology
Topic details
Total words: 1,710
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.5% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 15.7%15.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.3%Bandwagon: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos