Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos520 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Blockchain results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 498 hits. Analysis detected 3,819 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,597 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (12,007 of 16,562 topics). This Blockchain is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group.
Blockchain
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,597
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.5% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.5%6.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.8%10.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos