Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Black Lives Matter results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 40.8% saturation with 609 hits. Analysis detected 5,084 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,491 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Black Lives Matter is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Black Lives Matter
Topic details
Total words: 1,491
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 40.9%40.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.4%29.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 29.9%29.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 22.3%22.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 16.3%16.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 16.4%16.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 23.9%23.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 12.9%12.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 38.0%38.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Topic 40.9%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Topic 38.0%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 29.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 22.3%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 16.4%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 0.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos