Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Bird Conservation results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 338 hits. Analysis detected 3,005 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,008 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Bird Conservation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Bird Conservation
Topic details
Total words: 3,008
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.2%11.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.3%7.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos