Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,312 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Biomechanics results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma , Biased Writer Voice , and Recency Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 764 hits . Analysis detected 4,539 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (15,687 of 16,562 topics). This Biomechanics is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group. Biomechanics
Topic details
Total words: 10,496
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.3% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst