Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,312 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Biomechanics results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Biased Writer Voice, and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 764 hits. Analysis detected 4,539 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (15,687 of 16,562 topics). This Biomechanics is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group.
Biomechanics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,496
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

5% percentile
02550751005.3% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos