Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Biological Sex results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 570 hits. Analysis detected 5,909 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,280 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,683 topics). This Biological Sex is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Biological Sex
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,280
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 20.4%20.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 17.0%17.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 19.0%19.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.6%19.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 12.2%12.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.7%17.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.4%8.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.2%7.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.9%13.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.0%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 11.1%Straw Man: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 0.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%No True Scotsman: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos