Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,013 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Biolabs results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 532 hits. Analysis detected 4,014 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,052 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (13,903 of 16,562 topics). This Biolabs is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group.
Biolabs
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,052
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510016.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.4%2.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Special Pleading: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos