Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video472 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bills results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Bandwagon, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 374 hits. Analysis detected 1,507 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,689 of 16,562 topics). This Bills is worse (more manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.
Bills
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,888
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510071.7% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 16.1%16.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.8%19.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.4%6.4%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Bandwagon: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos