Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos800 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Billionaires results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,068 hits. Analysis detected 8,739 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,810 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,832 of 16,562 topics). This Billionaires is better (less manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.
Billionaires
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,810
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510034.6% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.7%13.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.5%12.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.4%6.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos