Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Billing Issues results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 359 hits. Analysis detected 2,596 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,373 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Billing Issues is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Billing Issues
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Billing Issues (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 2,373
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 14.2%14.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 12.2%12.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 15.1%15.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos