Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video692 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Billing Fraud results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Framing Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 398 hits. Analysis detected 2,610 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,768 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 64% (5,981 of 16,559 topics). This Billing Fraud is worse (more manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
Billing Fraud
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,768
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.9% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 12.5%12.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.4%14.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos