Topic summary
58% 2 analyzed articles/videos 562 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bilateral Relations results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 159 hits . Analysis detected 1,777 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,757 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 65% (5,488 of 15,651 topics). This Bilateral Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group. Bilateral Relations
Topic details
Total words: 1,757
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.9% percentile 3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.4%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst