Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Big Sur Hiker Death results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 225 hits. Analysis detected 1,161 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Big Sur Hiker Death is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Big Sur Hiker Death
Topic details
Total words: 1,416
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 15.9%15.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos