Topic summary
⁠53%1 analyzed article/video620 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Biblical Artifacts results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 192 hits. Analysis detected 1,549 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,860 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,287 of 16,562 topics). This Biblical Artifacts is better (less manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group.
Biblical Artifacts
Topic details
Total words: 1,860
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.9% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Special Pleading: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos