Topic summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 249 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bernie Sanders results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 750 hits . Analysis detected 5,705 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,117 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 48% (8,638 of 16,562 topics). This Bernie Sanders is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group. Bernie Sanders
Topic details
Total words: 5,117
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.8% percentile 2.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.5% 12.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.7% 14.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
MS NOW 95% 12/19/2025, 9:51:13 AM