Topic summary
⁠21%1 analyzed article/video535 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Benchmarking results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 135 hits. Analysis detected 367 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,070 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,219 of 16,562 topics). This Benchmarking is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group.
Benchmarking
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,070
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510080.6% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.6%12.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos