Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video878 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Affleck results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 364 hits. Analysis detected 2,218 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,512 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (11,988 of 15,854 topics). This Ben Affleck is better (less manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Ben Affleck
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,512
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510024.4% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.2%10.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos