Topic summary
64% 1 analyzed article/video 424 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beluga Whales results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , False Dilemma , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 128 hits . Analysis detected 1,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (5,778 of 16,504 topics). This Beluga Whales is worse (more manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group. Beluga Whales
Topic details
Total words: 1,272
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.0% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst