Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video498 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beer Foam results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Anecdotal, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 320 hits. Analysis detected 1,693 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (6,952 of 16,562 topics). This Beer Foam is worse (more manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group.
Beer Foam
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,992
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510058.0% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 16.1%16.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos