Topic summary
ā 69%1 analyzed article/video1,350 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beauty Trends results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 39.6% saturation with 1,604 hits. Analysis detected 2,885 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,050 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ā 53% (7,871 of 16,562 topics). This Beauty Trends is worse (more manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Beauty Trends
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 53%Beauty Trends (selected)4%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,050
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510052.5% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Productā€¦Sitewide 0.5%Topic 39.6%39.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 39.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos