Topic summary
⁠88%2 analyzed articles/videos1,947 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beauty Standards results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 1,307 hits. Analysis detected 7,889 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,753 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,309 of 15,852 topics). This Beauty Standards is better (less manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Beauty Standards
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,753
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.0% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.9%16.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos