Topic summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Barzan Plant results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Pessimism Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 151 hits . Analysis detected 966 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,428 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Barzan Plant is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Barzan Plant
Topic details
Total words: 1,428
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.6%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Composition/Division: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst