Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Bart Extension Project results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 247 hits. Analysis detected 1,804 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Bart Extension Project is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Bart Extension Project
Topic details
Total words: 2,104
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.7%11.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.9%7.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.1%9.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos