Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video930 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Banking Security results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Quote-first Misdirection, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 388 hits. Analysis detected 2,066 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 52% (7,606 of 15,801 topics). This Banking Security is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Banking Security
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,720
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.9% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.7%8.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.9%5.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos