Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 930 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Banking Security results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Quote-first Misdirection , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 388 hits . Analysis detected 2,066 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 52% (7,606 of 15,801 topics). This Banking Security is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group. Banking Security
Topic details
Total words: 3,720
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.9% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst