Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ballpark Proposal results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 172 hits. Analysis detected 1,133 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Ballpark Proposal is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Ballpark Proposal
Topic details
Total words: 1,840
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.1%5.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos