Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,415 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bad Bunny results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Unattributed Quote, and In-Group Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 994 hits. Analysis detected 10,929 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,072 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,703 of 16,562 topics). This Bad Bunny is worse (more manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
Bad Bunny
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,072
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510077.6% percentile
5.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 16.8%16.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 19.6%19.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 17.4%17.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.4%11.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 6.2%6.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.0%6.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Red Herring: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos