Topic summary
⁠16%1 analyzed article/video724 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Backpack Regulations results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Quote-first Misdirection, and Hasty Generalization, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 194 hits. Analysis detected 1,304 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,896 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (11,892 of 22,702 topics). This Backpack Regulations is better (less manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Backpack Regulations
Topic details
Total words: 2,896
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.6%2.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Middle Ground: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos