Topic summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video1,004 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Baby Bouncers results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 893 hits. Analysis detected 2,715 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,012 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,749 of 16,562 topics). This Baby Bouncers is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Baby Bouncers
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,012
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.3% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 29.6%29.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.1%0.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 29.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos