Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These B 52 Bomber Crash results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 279 hits. Analysis detected 1,956 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,148 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This B 52 Bomber Crash is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
B 52 Bomber Crash
Topic details
Total words: 3,148
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Middle Ground: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos