Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video417 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Avocado Farming results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 231 hits. Analysis detected 2,969 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,668 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (3,765 of 15,364 topics). This Avocado Farming is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Avocado Farming
Topic details
Total words: 1,668
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510075.5% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.8%13.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 7.5%7.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.1%7.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.0%8.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 6.2%6.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.0%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos