Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video693 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Avalanche results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 609 hits. Analysis detected 3,529 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,079 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 83% (2,941 of 16,530 topics). This Avalanche is worse (more manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group.
Avalanche
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,079
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510082.2% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 29.3%29.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 24.9%24.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.7%16.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 8.0%8.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 9.0%9.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Topic 29.3%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 24.9%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Gambler’s Fallacy: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos