Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 693 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Avalanche results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 609 hits . Analysis detected 3,529 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,079 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 83% (2,941 of 16,530 topics). This Avalanche is worse (more manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group. Avalanche
Topic details
Total words: 2,079
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.2% percentile 6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 29.3% 29.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 24.9% 24.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 16.7% 16.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.5% 8.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Topic 29.3%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 26.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 24.9%, sitewide 9.1% Negativity Bias: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Recency Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Gambler’s Fallacy: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst