Topic summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Automotive Industry Trends results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 274 hits. Analysis detected 1,822 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,407 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,075 of 16,562 topics). This Automotive Industry Trends is worse (more manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Automotive Industry Trends
Topic details
Total words: 1,407
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510081.4% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 19.5%19.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.4%14.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.5%15.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.4%7.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.4%5.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos