Topic summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video1,201 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Automated Strike Zone results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 454 hits. Analysis detected 2,844 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,603 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (8,051 of 16,562 topics). This Automated Strike Zone is worse (more manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group.
Automated Strike Zone
Topic details
Total words: 3,603
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.4% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.6%12.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos