Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,287 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Autoimmune Diseases results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 209 hits. Analysis detected 2,220 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (14,536 of 16,562 topics). This Autoimmune Diseases is better (less manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group.
Autoimmune Diseases
Topic details
Total words: 5,148
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

12% percentile
025507510012.2% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Straw Man: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos