Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video395 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Auto Type results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 159 hits. Analysis detected 1,154 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,611 of 16,562 topics). This Auto Type is worse (more manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Auto Type
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,580
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.0% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.9%4.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos