Topic summary
⁠1%1 analyzed article/video475 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Auto Theft Ring results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 158 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,425 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (13,536 of 16,562 topics). This Auto Theft Ring is better (less manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group.
Auto Theft Ring
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,425
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

18% percentile
025507510018.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos