Topic summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 4,574 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Auto Racing results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 1,221 hits . Analysis detected 10,635 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,678 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (14,648 of 15,763 topics). This Auto Racing is better (less manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group. Auto Racing
Topic details
Total words: 15,678
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.1% percentile 1.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles15.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst